The world of commercial property insurance is no longer a quiet backwater. It's a high-stakes arena where the forces of a changing climate, a volatile global economy, and rapid technological advancement collide. For the commercial property adjuster, this means the once-straightforward process of assessing a claim has become a potential breeding ground for complex, costly, and highly contentious disputes. The days of a simple handshake agreement are fading, replaced by sophisticated policyholders, aggressive third-party claimants, and insurers under immense pressure to control loss ratios. Successfully handling these disputes is no longer a niche skill; it is the core competency of a modern, effective adjuster.
The contemporary adjuster must be a hybrid professional: part investigator, part diplomat, part legal analyst, and part data scientist. The goal is not to "win" against the policyholder but to arrive at a fact-based, defensible, and equitable resolution that aligns with the policy's intent while protecting the insurer's financial integrity. Failure to do so can lead to lengthy litigation, reputational damage, and eroding trust in the entire insurance ecosystem.
To understand how to handle disputes, one must first understand what is causing them. The nature of commercial property claims has evolved dramatically.
Hurricanes, wildfires, floods, and severe convective storms are becoming more frequent and intense. A single event is often a compound disaster. A wildfire doesn't just burn a building; it causes smoke damage, water damage from firefighting efforts, and potential mudslides in the same policy period. This complexity creates immediate disputes over causation.
For example, a manufacturing plant may suffer structural damage from a hurricane's wind, followed by flood inundation from the subsequent storm surge. The policy might cover wind damage but exclude flood. The adjuster's task is to meticulously dissect the damage, often using forensic engineers, to allocate costs accurately. The policyholder, facing a massive loss, will naturally argue that the majority of the damage stems from the covered peril. This "concurrent causation" dilemma is a primary source of conflict in today's adjusting environment.
Furthermore, business interruption claims in the wake of climate events have become incredibly complex. Determining the period of restoration for a business in a region where the entire infrastructure is crippled is highly subjective and a fertile ground for dispute over lost profits and extra expenses.
The line between a traditional property claim and a cyber incident is blurring. Consider a ransomware attack that doesn't just encrypt data but takes control of a Building Management System (BMS), causing a failure in climate control that ruins a warehouse full of temperature-sensitive pharmaceuticals. Is this a cyber loss, a property loss, or both?
Many traditional commercial property policies were not drafted with these scenarios in mind. The adjuster must navigate ambiguous policy wording, often leading to a dispute over whether the physical damage to the inventory is a direct result of a covered "physical loss." The policyholder will argue the spoiled goods are tangible physical damage, while the insurer may point to the cyber-trigger as an excluded cause. Handling this requires a deep understanding of both property adjusting principles and emerging cyber threats.
Global supply chain disruptions and soaring inflation have turned the valuation of losses into a major battleground. A claim for rebuilding a structure or replacing machinery from two years ago is irrelevant at today's prices. The cost of materials like lumber, steel, and specialized components has skyrocketed, and lead times have stretched from weeks to months or even years.
This creates disputes over: * Actual Cash Value (ACV) vs. Replacement Cost Value (RCV): The depreciation calculation becomes highly contentious. What is the "useful life" of a piece of equipment that can't be replaced for 18 months? * Code Upgrades: The cost to comply with current building codes, which may have changed since the original structure was built, can be enormous. Disputes often arise over what upgrades are legally required and what the policy covers. * Expediting Expenses: The policyholder may need to pay a premium to air-freight a critical component to resume operations. Is this a covered "extra expense"? The adjuster must determine reasonableness in an unreasonable market.
Waiting for a dispute to erupt is a reactive and often losing strategy. The modern adjuster must build a fortress of facts from the moment the claim is reported.
The first 72 hours of a claim are critical. Your initial actions set the tone.
Do not try to be the hero who knows everything. Your role is to manage the fact-finding process.
When a disagreement arises, your approach to negotiation will determine its outcome.
Despite best efforts, some disputes cannot be resolved through direct negotiation. It is crucial to know and manage the escalation process.
Mediation is a facilitated negotiation with a neutral third party. It is almost always the best next step before considering litigation. * Why it Works: It is confidential, less expensive, and faster than litigation. The mediator helps each side see the weaknesses in their own case and the strengths in the other's, fostering compromise. It leaves control of the outcome with the parties, unlike a judge or jury. * The Adjuster's Role: Come prepared with a clear, well-documented presentation. Know your "walk-away" number but be prepared to be flexible. The goal is to find a "zone of possible agreement" that is within your authority and satisfies the policyholder's core interests.
Most property policies include an appraisal clause for when the parties disagree on the value of the loss (but not on coverage). * The Process: Each party hires its own appraiser. The two appraisers then select an umpire. If the appraisers cannot agree, the umpire decides. The outcome is typically binding on the value. * Strategic Use: Appraisal is excellent for resolving straightforward disputes over repair costs or ACV/RCV calculations. However, it can be a gamble, as the outcome is out of your direct control. Choose your appraiser wisely—they should be highly credible and experienced, not just a hired gun.
Litigation is the failure of the dispute resolution process. It is public, incredibly expensive, time-consuming, and unpredictable. * The Adjuster's Pivotal Role: If a claim goes to suit, the adjuster transitions from resolver to key witness. Your entire claim file—every email, note, photo, and report—will be discoverable. This underscores the absolute necessity of professional, objective, and thorough documentation from the very beginning. Any hint of bad faith, bias, or sloppiness will be exploited by the opposing counsel. * Working with Defense Counsel: Your role is to be the factual expert on the claim. You will help counsel understand the technical details of the loss, the basis for your coverage decisions, and the history of your communications with the policyholder.
The modern commercial property adjuster operates in a world of heightened risks and complexities. Disputes are not a sign of failure but an inherent part of the landscape. By adopting a proactive, technologically-enabled, empathetic, and strategic approach, adjusters can navigate these disputes effectively. They can transform potential legal battles into managed processes that, even when difficult, uphold the promise of the insurance policy and maintain the fragile trust upon which the entire industry depends. The goal is not to avoid conflict altogether, but to manage it with such skill and integrity that all parties, even in disagreement, feel the process was fundamentally fair.
Copyright Statement:
Author: Travel Insurance List
Link: https://travelinsurancelist.github.io/blog/commercial-property-adjuster-how-to-handle-disputes.htm
Source: Travel Insurance List
The copyright of this article belongs to the author. Reproduction is not allowed without permission.